Archive for the ‘Apoptosis’ Category

Cytotoxic effects of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) on cochlear organotypic cultures

Comments Off
Posted 17 Jun 2011 — by James Street
Category Apoptosis, DMSO
Hear Res. 2008 Feb;236(1-2):52-60. Epub 2007 Dec 15.

Source

Center for Hearing and Deafness, State University of New York at Buffalo, 137Cary Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.

Abstract

The amphipathic molecule dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) is a solvent often used to dissolve compounds applied to the inner ear; however, little is known about its potential cytotoxic side effects. To address this question, we applied 0.1-6% DMSO for 24h to cochlear organotypic cultures from postnatal day 3 rats and examined its cytotoxic effects. DMSO concentrations of 0.1% and 0.25% caused little or no damage. However, concentrations between 0.5% and 6% resulted in stereocilia damage, hair cell swelling and a dose-dependent loss of hair cells. Hair cell damage began in the basal turn of the cochlea and spread towards the apex with increasing concentration. Surprisingly, DMSO-induced damage was greater for inner hair cells than outer hair cell whereas nearby supporting cells were largely unaffected. Most hair cell death was associated with nuclear shrinkage and fragmentation, morphological features consistent with apoptosis. DMSO treatment induced TUNEL-positive staining in many hair cells and activated both initiator caspase-9 and caspase-8 and executioner caspase-3; this suggests that apoptosis is initiated by both intrinsic mitochondrial and extrinsic membrane cell death signaling pathways.

PMID:
18207679
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PMCID: PMC2262105

Free PMC Article

Growth-inhibitory effects of the astaxanthin-rich alga Haematococcus pluvialis in human colon cancer cells

Comments Off
Posted 16 Jun 2011 — by James Street
Category Apoptosis, Colon Cancer, Drug Testing, General Cancer Research
Paola PalozzaaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Cristiana Torellia, Alma Boninsegnaa, Rossella Simonea, Assunta Catalanoa, Maria Cristina Meleb, Nevio Piccic

Received 19 December 2008; received in revised form 17 March 2009; accepted 18 March 2009. published online 08 May 2009.

Abstract

The growth-inhibitory effects of the astaxanthin-rich Haematococcus pluvialis were studied in HCT-116 colon cancer cells. H. pluvialis extract (5–25μg/ml) inhibited cell growth in a dose- and time-dependent manner, by arresting cell cycle progression and by promoting apoptosis. At 25μg/ml of H. pluvialis extract, an increase of p53, p21WAF-1/CIP-1 and p27 expression (220%, 160%, 250%, respectively) was observed, concomitantly with a decrease of cyclin D1 expression (58%) and AKT phosphorylation (21%). Moreover, the extract, at the same concentration, strongly up-regulated apoptosis by modifying the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL, and increased the phosphorylation of p38, JNK, and ERK1/2 by 160%, 242%, 280%, respectively. Growth-inhibitory effects by H. pluvialis were also observed in HT-29, LS-174, WiDr, SW-480 cells. This study suggests that H. pluvialis may protect from colon cancer.

Common Anti-Inflammatory Coaxes Liver Cancer Cells to Commit Suicide

Comments Off
Posted 16 May 2011 — by James Street
Category Apoptosis, Bioinformatics, Drugs, Epigenetics, genetic research, Inflamation, Liver, STAT3
Released: 5/16/2011 11:50 AM EDT
Source: Ohio State University

Newswise — COLUMBUS, Ohio – The anti-inflammatory drug celecoxib, known by the brand name Celebrex, triggers liver cancer cell death by reacting with a protein in a way that makes those cells commit suicide, according to a new study.

Researchers also found that the combination of celecoxib with each of two chemotherapy drugs killed more liver cancer cells in culture, making those combinations more effective than either drug on its own.

“Each chemotherapy drug alone will reduce the growth of cancer cells, but when each single drug is combined with Celebrex, a greater growth suppression effect was observed,” said Jiayuh Lin, senior author of the study and an associate professor of pediatrics at Ohio State University. “For clinicians, this research suggests the possibility of a new therapeutic strategy.”

Celecoxib has this effect by acting on STAT3, a gene inside liver cancer cells that, when activated, allows those cancer cells to resist the effects of chemotherapy drugs. The researchers determined that the celecoxib molecule binds to STAT3 on so-called “hot spots,” effectively blocking its ability to function.

Powerful computing techniques were employed before the researchers ever considered celecoxib as a potential treatment for cancer. Celebrex is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or NSAID, and a Cox-2 inhibitor, meaning it helps control inflammation by inhibiting an enzyme known as cyclooxygenase-2. It is most commonly prescribed to treat the pain of arthritis.

Chenglong Li, an assistant professor of medicinal chemistry and pharmacognosy at Ohio State, has developed computer simulations to identify optimal drug fragment combinations that attach simultaneously to proteins in ways that block the proteins’ functions. By searching a database of existing federally approved drugs, he found that celecoxib was structurally similar to a template molecule that he had determined would most effectively bind to STAT3 and inhibit its function.

“Normally, STAT3 is persistently activated in cancer cells. If you have a good molecule that sticks to STAT3, it will prevent its activation,” Li said. And when STAT3 is inhibited, cellular survival pathways are blocked that cause the cancer cell to chop itself up and die.

The research appears online and is scheduled for later print publication in the journal Cancer Prevention Research.

The biological portion of the study further defined the role of a pro-inflammatory protein in liver cancer’s development. The protein, called interleukin-6, or IL-6, is a cytokine, a chemical messenger that causes inflammation, which can have both beneficial and damaging effects in the body. Previous research by other scientists has shown that high levels of IL-6 in the blood are associated with hepatocellular carcinoma, the most common type of liver cancer.

Lin and colleagues determined that IL-6 initiates a chemical reaction called phosphorylation of STAT3. That reaction activates STAT3 inside liver cancer cells, where STAT3 in turn activates at least three other known genes that allow the cells to resist the effects of chemotherapy.

The scientists treated five different types of hepatocellular carcinoma cells with two different doses of celecoxib for two hours, and followed by giving them IL-6 for 30 minutes. The pre-treatment with the lower dose of celecoxib inhibited IL-6’s ability to start the reaction that activates STAT3. The higher dose blocked STAT3 altogether.

The researchers then treated a line of liver cancer cells with celecoxib in combination with two chemotherapy drugs: doxorubicin, which is used to treat breast, ovarian, gastric, thyroid and several other cancers, and sorafenib, which is the only chemotherapy medication approved by the Food and Drug Administration for liver cancer treatment. Its brand name is Nexavar.

With both drugs, the addition of celecoxib treatment reduced the number of viable liver cancer cells by anywhere from approximately 50 percent to more than 90 percent, depending on the doses. The combination of celecoxib and sorafenib also significantly limited the cancer cells’ ability to form colonies, a key element of tumor growth and survival after the drug treatment.

“Because liver cancer has a very low five-year survival rate, it is most likely that even sorafenib alone may not be effective to cure the cancer,” said Lin, also an investigator in Ohio State’s Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Center for Childhood Cancer at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. “We hope that using both drugs together could be more effective. Both celecoxib and sorafenib are already approved by the FDA, so we think this combined treatment should be able to be used in the clinic pretty quickly.”

The fifth most common cancer in humans, liver cancer remains one of the most difficult to successfully treat. Patients’ overall five-year survival rate is about 10 percent, according to the American Cancer Society.

These experiments were conducted in cell cultures. Further testing would be needed to determine celecoxib’s effectiveness in human cancers, Lin noted.

And the powerful computational work led by Li, also an investigator in Ohio State’s Comprehensive Cancer Center, is likely to lead to the development of new molecules with even more precise structural relationships with the proteins they are designed to block.

Li’s method is called Multiple Ligand Simultaneous Docking. In this work, he used computer simulations to identify “hot spots” on the STAT3 protein – tiny pockets to which molecules could most successfully attach to inhibit the protein’s activity. He then searched through drug banks containing more than 7,500 existing and experimental medications to find the most suitable molecular fragments that could be pieced together to produce a new molecule shaped in such a way that it would fit into those pockets.

After designing a template molecule that would most effectively bind to STAT3, he compared that template to the 1,400 federally approved drugs already on the market.

“Celecoxib is almost identical to the molecule template. It attaches to STAT3 in three places. We can optimize celecoxib, and that is expected to come soon. But applying our technique to find those pieces and determining that they come from an existing drug makes the discovery process much faster,” said Li, a key co-author of the paper and frequent research collaborator with Lin.

Li has termed this approach as in silico (computer-driven) drug repositioning or repurposing.

The discovery that celecoxib can bind to STAT3 also appears to apply to other cancers. Both Lin and Li were key authors on a recent paper that suggested that celecoxib’s ability to block STAT3’s function might also make it effective as a treatment for rhabdomyosarcoma, the most common soft tissue cancer in children and adolescents. This research was published in the April 15 issue of the journal Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.

Co-authors of the liver cancer and rhabdomyosarcoma studies include Yan Liu, Aiguo Liu and Suzanne Reed of the Center for Childhood Cancer at Nationwide Children’s Hospital (Aiguo Liu is also affiliated with Tongji Hospital at Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, China); and Huameng Li of Ohio State’s Division of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy and the Biophysics Graduate Program.

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs.

U-M Says New Cancer Drug Ready For Clinical Trials

Comments Off
Posted 30 Mar 2011 — by James Street
Category Apoptosis, Drug Testing, Drugs
POSTED: Tuesday, March 29, 2011
UPDATED: 4:32 pm EDT March 29, 2011

ANN ARBOR, Mich. — A new cancer drug developed at the University of Michigan is ready to be tested in humans.

The drug is called AT-406.

According to a study published in the Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, AT-406 effectively targets proteins that block normal cell death from occurring. In animal studies, blocking these proteins shrank tumors, without harming normal cells. The drug caused few side effects.

Researchers said the drug may potentially be effective against multiple kinds of cancer.

“Removing key apoptosis blockades in tumor cells is a completely new cancer therapeutic approach and could have benefit for the treatment of many types of human tumors,” said study author Dr. Shaomeng Wang, the director of the Cancer Drug Discovery Program at the U-M Comprehensive Cancer Center.

The drug is designed to be taken orally.

The clinical trial is being offered at the U-M Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duke University and the Mayo Clinic.

To learn more about this research study, click here or call the Cancer AnswerLine at 800-865-1125.

Marshall Edwards to Report new Data on Mitochondrial Inhibitor Program at American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting

Comments Off
Posted 30 Mar 2011 — by James Street
Category Apoptosis, Drug Companies, Drug Testing, Drugs, Mitochondria

Late-Breaking Poster Presentation at AACR on Monday, April 4

SAN DIEGO, March 29, 2011 /PRNewswire/ — Marshall Edwards, Inc.(Nasdaq: MSHL), an oncology company focused on the clinical development of novel therapeutics targeting cancer metabolism, announced today that an abstract highlighting the Company’s mitochondrial inhibitor program has been accepted for a late-breaking poster presentation at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting on Monday, April 4, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. EDT at the Orange County Convention Center in Orlando.

Ayesha Alvero, M.D., Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences at Yale University School of Medicine, will present new laboratory data demonstrating the ability of NV-128, Marshall Edwards’ first-generation investigational compound, to significantly depress mitochondrial function and induce cell death in chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer stem cells.  This cell death results from the activation of two independent pathways: 1) AMP kinase leading to the inhibition of mTOR1 and mTOR2 and the induction of autophagy; and 2) mitochondrial MEK/ERK leading to mitochondrial depolarization. These data suggest that the simultaneous activation of these pathways appears to be a potent stimulus to induce cell death in a chemo-resistant ovarian cancer stem cell population identified by researchers at Yale University.

A copy of the poster, entitled “Depression of Mitochondrial Bioenergetics is a Potent Death Stimulus in the Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells,” will be available immediately following Dr. Alvero’s presentation at www.marshalledwardsinc.com.

Marshall Edwards has identified a next-generation compound called NV-344 that has demonstrated significantly more activity than NV-128 across a broad range of tumor cells in pre-clinical studies. The Company is in the process of completing drug manufacturing of NV-344, after which it plans to conduct the necessary studies required to initiate clinical trials later this year.

About Marshall Edwards

Marshall Edwards, Inc. (Nasdaq: MSHL) is a San Diego-based oncology company focused on the clinical development of novel anti-cancer therapeutics. The Company’s lead programs focus on two families of small molecules that result in the inhibition of tumor cell metabolism. The first and most advanced is a NADH oxidase inhibitor program that includes lead drug candidate NV-143. The second is a mitochondrial inhibitor program that includes NV-128 and its next-generation candidate NV-344. Both programs are expected to advance into the clinic in 2011. For more information, please visit www.marshalledwardsinc.com.

Under U.S. law, a new drug cannot be marketed until it has been investigated in clinical trials and approved by the FDA as being safe and effective for the intended use. Statements included in this press release that are not historical in nature are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should be aware that our actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, our failure to successfully commercialize our product candidates; costs and delays in the development and/or FDA approval, or the failure to obtain such approval, of our product candidates; uncertainties or differences in interpretation in clinical trial results; our inability to maintain or enter into, and the risks resulting from our dependence upon, collaboration or contractual arrangements necessary for the development, manufacture, commercialization, marketing, sales and distribution of any products; competitive factors; our inability to protect our patents or proprietary rights and obtain necessary rights to third party patents and intellectual property to operate our business; our inability to operate our business without infringing the patents and proprietary rights of others; general economic conditions; the failure of any products to gain market acceptance; our inability to obtain any additional required financing; technological changes; government regulation; changes in industry practice; and one-time events. We do not intend to update any of these factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements.

SOURCE Marshall Edwards, Inc.