<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defeat Osteosarcoma &#187; Imaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/category/uncategorized/imaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org</link>
	<description>This site is dedicated to curing osteosarcoma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 05:20:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Maximum Image Quality, Minimum Radiation Dose: Siemens Announces The International CT Image Contest 2011</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2011/03/maximum-image-quality-minimum-radiation-dose-siemens-announces-the-international-ct-image-contest-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2011/03/maximum-image-quality-minimum-radiation-dose-siemens-announces-the-international-ct-image-contest-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=1964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[06 Mar 2011 Following on from the amazing success of the first computed tomography (CT) image contest in 2010, Siemens Healthcare has announced the &#8220;International CT Image Contest 2011&#8243;. Institutions and clinics around the globe will submit their best clinical images, taken with the lowest possible radiation dose on Siemens CTs, to a jury of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>06 Mar 2011</p>
<p>Following on from the amazing success of the first computed  tomography (CT) image contest in 2010, Siemens Healthcare has announced  the &#8220;International CT Image Contest 2011&#8243;. Institutions and clinics  around the globe will submit their best clinical images, taken with the  lowest possible radiation dose on Siemens CTs, to a jury of  internationally renowned professors. The contest starts on March 3rd,  and the closing date for entries is September 18th, 2011. The winners  will be announced at the next conference of the Radiological Society of  North America (RSNA 2011) in Chicago.</p>
<p>&#8220;In our first contest the jury received around 300 clinical  images from more than 30 countries&#8221;, says Andre Hartung, Head of  Business Segment Computed Tomography at Siemens Healthcare. &#8220;We are  pretty sure that as many of our customers as possible will take part  again, as at Siemens radiation protection and dose reduction have always  been a top priority in CT, right from the moment when the company  launched the first computed tomography (CT) system in 1974.&#8221;</p>
<p>Excellent image quality is essential for computed tomography  (CT). At the same time, the patient&#8217;s exposure to radiation should be as  low as possible. Siemens Healthcare aims to help its customers make  maximum use of the hardware and software to reduce dose on CTs and to  share their experience with other users of Siemens CTs and interested  audience. Which is why a 2nd International CT Image Contest will be held  from March 3rd 2011 to September 18th, 2011. Customers who use a CT of  the Somatom Definition family, a Somatom Emotion, Somatom Sensation or  Somatom Spirit will be able to present clinical images &#8211; which have been  reprocessed with Syngo CT Worksplace, Syngo MMWP or Syngo.via &#8211; in  seven categories to an international jury of acknowledged experts:  cardiology, angiography, dual energy, pediatrics, trauma, neurology and  areas of their clinical routine, which includes thorax, abdomen and  pelvis.</p>
<p>The Siemens &#8220;International CT Image Contest 2010&#8243; was a huge  success, with participants from over 30 countries, who submitted a total  of around 300 images. There was even a fan community on Facebook with  more than 1600 members, who discussed the images submitted. In addition  to which, all internet users could vote for their favorite picture in a  public vote. The internet page devoted to the contest received 17,000  hits within 6 months. The aim was to make the public aware of the  responsibility that manufacturers and radiologists have as regards  diagnostic radiation. The innovative concept of the contest received the  accolade of two well-known communication awards: the Comprix 2010 Gold  Award and the iF Communication Design Award.</p>
<p>For terms and conditions of entry for the &#8220;International CT Image Contest 2011&#8243; go <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.siemens.com/image-contest" target="_blank">here.</a></p>
<p>Source:<br />
Siemens Healthcare Sector</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2011/03/maximum-image-quality-minimum-radiation-dose-siemens-announces-the-international-ct-image-contest-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New prostate cancer imaging shows real-time tumor metabolism</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/new-prostate-cancer-imaging-shows-real-time-tumor-metabolism/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/new-prostate-cancer-imaging-shows-real-time-tumor-metabolism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 20:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostate Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=1264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contact: Kristen Bole kristen.bole@ucsf.edu 415-502-6397 University of California &#8211; San Francisco A UCSF research collaboration with GE Healthcare has produced the first results in humans of a new technology that promises to rapidly assess the presence and aggressiveness of prostate tumors in real time, by imaging the tumor&#8217;s metabolism. This is the first time researchers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contact: Kristen Bole<br />
kristen.bole@ucsf.edu<br />
415-502-6397<br />
University of California &#8211; San Francisco</p>
<p>A UCSF research collaboration with GE Healthcare has produced the first results in humans of a new technology that promises to rapidly assess the presence and aggressiveness of prostate tumors in real time, by imaging the tumor&#8217;s metabolism.</p>
<p>This is the first time researchers have used this technology to conduct real-time metabolic imaging in a human patient and represents a revolutionary approach to assessing the precise outlines of a tumor, its response to treatment and how quickly it is growing.</p>
<p>Data on the first four patients will be presented on Dec. 2 at the Radiology Society of North America&#8217;s weeklong annual conference.</p>
<p>The initial results validate extensive preclinical research that has linked the speed at which tumors metabolize nutrients to the aggressiveness of their growth. The new imaging technique also has been used to show early biochemical changes in animal tumors in real time as they respond to medication therapy, long before a physical change occurs.</p>
<p>So far, the technology has produced the same response in human patients&#8217; tumors as it did in laboratory studies, even at the lowest dose, according to Sarah Nelson, PhD, a professor of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging and a member of the California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3) at UCSF.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a key milestone that could dramatically change clinical treatment for prostate cancer and many other tumors,&#8221; Nelson said. &#8220;We had shown this worked in animal models and tissues samples. Now, in men, we are seeing exactly the type of results we had hoped for.&#8221;</p>
<p>For an oncologist, that means immediate feedback on whether a patient&#8217;s therapy is working, either during standard treatment or in a clinical trial.</p>
<p>&#8220;If we can see whether a therapy is effective in real time, we may be able to make early changes in that treatment that could have a very real impact on a patient&#8217;s outcome and quality of life,&#8221; said Andrea Harzstark, MD, an oncologist with the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center who is leading the clinical aspects of the current study.</p>
<p>More than 200,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer each year and 28,000 die from it, making it one of the most common cancer in men nationwide and also one of the leading causes of cancer death in men, according to the Centers for Disease Control.</p>
<p>Yet the disease ranges widely in its rate of growth and aggressiveness, according to John Kurhanewicz, PhD, a UCSF expert in prostate cancer imaging. As a result, there is great debate over the ideal strategy for treating the disease, he said, leaving patients with a difficult and potentially life-changing decision over how aggressively to respond to the disease.</p>
<p>&#8220;This test could give both physicians and patients the information they need to make that decision,&#8221; said Kurhanewicz, whose work with Dan Vigneron, PhD, and their colleagues from the UCSF Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging first linked a prostate tumor&#8217;s production of lactate to tumor aggressiveness. Other researchers also have linked that lactate production to tumor aggressiveness and response to therapy in other cancers.</p>
<p>The method uses compounds involved in normal tissue function – in this case, pyruvate, which is a naturally occurring by-product of glucose, and lactate, also known as lactic acid – and uses newly developed equipment to increase the visibility of those compounds by a factor of 50,000 in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner.</p>
<p>That process requires pyruvate to be prepared in a strong magnetic field at a temperature of minus 272O C, then rapidly warmed to body temperature and transferred to the patient in an MRI scanner before the polarization decays back to its native state.</p>
<p>The result is a highly defined and clear image of the tumor&#8217;s outline, as well as a graph of the amount of pyruvate in the tumor and the rate at which the tumor converts the pyruvate into lactate.</p>
<p>The sterile production process requires a dedicated clinical pharmacist with the knowledge of both quality control and of clinical practice. As the birthplace of the field of clinical pharmacy and one of only a handful of schools nationwide with drug production expertise, the UCSF School of Pharmacy and contributions of Marcus Ferrone, PharmD, and his colleagues in the Drug Products Services Laboratory were integral to this process.</p>
<p>The procedure must take place within minutes, which meant integrating a clean room into the scanning facility. QB3 also worked with GE Healthcare in designing Byers Hall, in which the Surbeck Laboratory of Advanced Imaging is housed, to accommodate the extremely strong magnetic field of the MRI scanner and enable time-sensitive experiments.</p>
<p>&#8220;All of that insight is why we moved this technology to Northern California,&#8221; said Jonathan Murray, general manager, Metabolic Imaging at GE Healthcare. &#8220;This is a huge accomplishment UCSF and QB3 have achieved. They brought together the best engineering from UC Berkeley and the best bioscience and pharmacy knowledge from UCSF, and are now demonstrating the technology in a world-renowned academic medical center. We are delighted with the speed of progress of this collaboration. The science is very exciting.&#8221;</p>
<p>The first trial involves men with prostate cancer involved in the &#8220;watchful waiting&#8221; phase of treatment, Nelson said. Future studies will directly compare these data with the results from surgically removed tumors and will look at how specific therapies change tumor metabolism. UCSF also will be studying the process for use in brain tumor patients.</p>
<p>The project&#8217;s funding through the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, in the National Institutes of Health, was critical in adapting this technology for humans and developing new ways to obtain the MR metabolic imaging data. The project received further support from the American Recovery &amp; Reinvestment Act and the UC Discovery Program.</p>
<p>Initial development of this instrumentation and its demonstration of proof of principle was conducted by Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen, Klaes Golman and other colleagues from across GE. UCSF customized that principle and obtained the Investigational New Drug (IND) approval from the Food and Drug Administration to use the hyperpolarized pyruvate in humans.</p>
<p>###</p>
<p>These concepts are still investigational and not being offered for sale, nor have they been cleared or approved by the FDA for commercial availability.</p>
<p>About GE Healthcare</p>
<p>GE Healthcare provides transformational medical technologies and services that are shaping a new age of patient care. Our broad expertise in medical imaging and information technologies, medical diagnostics, patient monitoring systems, drug discovery, biopharmaceutical manufacturing technologies, performance improvement and performance solutions services help our customers to deliver better care to more people around the world at a lower cost. In addition, we partner with healthcare leaders, striving to leverage the global policy change necessary to implement a successful shift to sustainable healthcare systems.</p>
<p>Our &#8220;healthymagination&#8221; vision for the future invites the world to join us on our journey as we continuously develop innovations focused on reducing costs, increasing access and improving quality around the world. Headquartered in the United Kingdom, GE Healthcare is a unit of General Electric Company (NYSE: GE). Worldwide, GE Healthcare employees are committed to serving healthcare professionals and their patients in more than 100 countries. For more information about GE Healthcare, visit our website at www.gehealthcare.com.</p>
<p>About QB3 and UCSF</p>
<p>QB3 is a cooperative effort among private industry and more than 200 scientists at UCSF, UC Berkeley and UC Santa Cruz. One of four California technology institutes, QB3 harnesses the quantitative sciences of information technology, imaging and engineering to integrate and enhance scientific understanding of biological systems, enabling scientists to tackle problems that have been previously unapproachable. Please visit www.qb3.org.</p>
<p>UCSF is a leading university dedicated to promoting health worldwide through advanced biomedical research, graduate-level education in the life sciences and health professions, and excellence in patient care. For more information on UCSF, visit www.ucsf.edu. For specific information on UCSF imaging, visit: www.radiology.ucsf.edu/research.</p>
<p>Follow UCSF on Twitter at http://twitter.com/ucsf</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/new-prostate-cancer-imaging-shows-real-time-tumor-metabolism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A World&#8217;s First In Imaging &#8211; Integrated Whole-body Molecular MR System Available For Clinical Use Testing</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/a-worlds-first-in-imaging-integrated-whole-body-molecular-mr-system-available-for-clinical-use-testing/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/a-worlds-first-in-imaging-integrated-whole-body-molecular-mr-system-available-for-clinical-use-testing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 06:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=1197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[21 Nov 2010 Today, Siemens Healthcare unveils its new system, Biograph mMR, the world&#8217;s first integrated whole-body molecular MR with simultaneous data acquisition technology, currently undergoing clinical use testing. This revolutionary system comprises a magnetic resonance (MR) scanner and an integrated PET (Positron Emission Tomography) detection system with an architecture that performs as one. In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21 Nov 2010</p>
<p>Today, Siemens Healthcare unveils its new system, Biograph mMR, the  world&#8217;s first integrated whole-body molecular MR with simultaneous data  acquisition technology, currently undergoing clinical use testing. This  revolutionary system comprises a magnetic resonance (MR) scanner and an  integrated PET (Positron Emission Tomography) detection system with an  architecture that performs as one. In the new 3-tesla hybrid system,  Siemens developers have succeeded for the first time in simultaneously  capturing MR and PET data with a whole-body system. The Biograph mMR  system has been installed at the university hospital Klinikum rechts der  Isar of the Munich Technical University, Germany.</p>
<p>&#8220;Together with our partner Siemens we are entering a new  dimension in diagnostic imaging today&#8221;, said Prof. Dr. Markus Schwaiger,  director of the clinic for nuclear medicine at the university hospital.  &#8220;We&#8217;ve initiated clinical use testing of Biograph mMR in an effort to  diagnose diseases at a very early stage; to see the progression of  disease and to use that information to develop a therapy plan precisely  focused on the respective patient. Furthermore, we plan to use the  system for cancer follow-up in the long run, by reducing radiation  exposure by the use of the system.&#8221;</p>
<p>With the simultaneous acquisition of MR and PET data, this  system is designed to provide new opportunities for imaging. While MR  provides exquisite morphological and functional details in human tissue,  PET goes further to investigate the human body at the level of cellular  activity and metabolism. The innovative system has the potential to be a  particularly valuable tool for identifying neurological, oncological  and cardiac conditions of disease and in supporting the planning of  appropriate therapies. Since MRI does not emit ionizing radiation,  Biograph mMR may provide an added benefit with lower-dose imaging. The  Biograph mMR also opens new opportunities for research, such as the  development of new biomarkers or new therapeutic approaches.</p>
<p>&#8220;Biograph mMR is the latest breakthrough innovation of Siemens  in the field of diagnostic imaging. It will be a new instrument for  driving personalized medicine forward&#8221;, said Walter Maerzendorfer, CEO  of the Business Unit Magnetic Resonance at Siemens Healthcare. &#8220;Biograph  mMR is designed to simultaneously acquire morphology, function, and  metabolism for the entire body&#8221;, added Britta Fuenfstueck, CEO of the  Business Unit Molecular Imaging at Siemens Healthcare.</p>
<p>MR and PET have become an established part of everyday  healthcare routines and have proven themselves to be valuable clinical  diagnostic tools. The integration of these two technologies into a  single system capable of simultaneous acquisition brings the potential  to revolutionize the diagnosis of many conditions. Initial research  suggests that with this system, Molecular MR can scan the entire body in  as little as 30 minutes for the combined exams, compared to one hour or  more for sequential MR and PET examinations.</p>
<p>Siemens envisions a wide range of clinical applications for  molecular MR including the early identification and staging of  malignancies, therapy planning (including surgery planning) and therapy  control.</p>
<p><strong>A technical revolution </strong></p>
<p>Until now, it was nearly impossible to integrate MR and PET  technologies: the conventional PET detectors, which use photomultiplier  tubes, could not be used in the strong magnetic field generated by an MR  system. Integration was further limited by the lack of space inside the  MR device. For this reason, MR-PET imaging was the result of two  separate scans (MR and PET) with a significant time lag. With Biograph  mMR, Siemens brings the first molecular MR system for clinical research  that integrates MR with compact, specialized PET detectors.</p>
<p>The Biograph mMR &#8211; incorporating Tim, the &#8220;Total imaging matrix&#8221;  technology from Siemens may make it even quicker and easier for  clinicians to perform the MR examination.</p>
<p>*The Biograph mMR system requires 510(k) review by the FDA and  is not commercially available. Due to regulatory reasons its future  availability in any country cannot be guaranteed. Please contact your  local Siemens organization for further details.</p>
<p>The outcomes achieved by the Siemens customers described herein  were achieved in the customer&#8217;s unique setting. Since there is no  &#8220;typical&#8221; hospital and many variables exist, e.g., hospital size, case  mix, level of IT adoption, there can be no guarantee that others will  achieve the same results.</p>
<p>Source:<br />
Siemens Healthcare Sector</p>
<hr size="1" />Article URL: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/208662.php</p>
<p><strong>Main News Category</strong>: MRI / PET / Ultrasound</p>
<p><strong>Also Appears In</strong>:  Radiology / Nuclear Medicine,</p>
<p><img src="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/images/blanktab.gif" alt="" width="1" height="10" /></p>
<hr size="1" />
<div>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td bgcolor="#ffffff">Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a  substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any  action before consulting with a health care  		professional. For more information, please read our <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/index.php?page=termsandconditions&amp;title=Terms+and+Conditions">terms and conditions</a>.</p>
<p>Save time! Get the latest medical news headlines for your specialist area, in a weekly newsletter e-mail. See <a href="http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/newsletters.php">http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/newsletters.php</a> for details.</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p>Send your press releases to  	<a href="mailto:pressrelease@medicalnewstoday.com">pressrelease@medicalnewstoday.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/a-worlds-first-in-imaging-integrated-whole-body-molecular-mr-system-available-for-clinical-use-testing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New imaging technique accurately finds cancer cells, fast</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/new-imaging-technique-accurately-finds-cancer-cells-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/new-imaging-technique-accurately-finds-cancer-cells-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 20:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=1185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nov 24th, 2010 New imaging technique accurately finds cancer cells, fast (Nanowerk News) The long, anxious wait for biopsy results could soon be over, thanks to a tissue-imaging technique developed at the University of Illinois. The research team demonstrated the novel microscopy technique, called nonlinear interferometric vibrational imaging (NIVI), on rat breast-cancer cells and tissues. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table border="0" cellspacing="10" cellpadding="5">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="600">Nov 24th, 2010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="600" align="center">New imaging technique accurately finds cancer cells, fast</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">(<em>Nanowerk News</em>) The long, anxious wait for biopsy results could  soon be over, thanks to a tissue-imaging technique developed at the  University of Illinois.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">The research team demonstrated the novel microscopy technique, called  nonlinear interferometric vibrational imaging (NIVI), on rat  breast-cancer cells and tissues. It produced easy-to-read, color-coded  images of tissue, outlining clear tumor boundaries, with more than 99  percent confidence – in less than five minutes.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Led by professor and physician Stephen A. Boppart, who holds  appointments in electrical and computer engineering, bioengineering and  medicine, the Illinois researchers will publish their findings on the  cover of the Dec. 1 issue of the journal<em> Cancer Research</em>.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center"><img src="http://www.nanowerk.com/news/id19154.jpg" border="0" alt="From left, Eric Chaney, a research specialist at the Beckman Institute; Stephen Boppart, a professor of electrical and computer engineering, of bioengineering and of medicine; Martin Gruebele, a professor of chemistry and of physics; and Wladamir Benalcazar, a graduate fellow at the Beckman Institute" width="500" align="middle" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" align="center" valign="middle">From  left, Eric Chaney, a research specialist at the Beckman Institute;  Stephen Boppart, a professor of electrical and computer engineering, of  bioengineering and of medicine; Martin Gruebele, a professor of  chemistry and of physics; and Wladamir Benalcazar, a graduate fellow at  the Beckman Institute.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p>In addition to taking a day or more for results, current diagnostic  methods are subjective, based on visual interpretations of cell shape  and structure. A small sample of suspect tissue is taken from a patient,  and a stain is added to make certain features of the cells easier to  see. A pathologist looks at the sample under a microscope to see if the  cells look unusual, often consulting other pathologists to confirm a  diagnosis.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">&#8220;The diagnosis is made based on very subjective interpretation – how the  cells are laid out, the structure, the morphology,&#8221; said Boppart, who  is also affiliated with the university&#8217;s Beckman Institute for Advanced  Science and Technology. &#8220;This is what we call the gold standard for  diagnosis. We want to make the process of medical diagnostics more  quantitative and more rapid.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Rather than focus on cell and tissue structure, NIVI assesses and  constructs images based on molecular composition. Normal cells have high  concentrations of lipids, but cancerous cells produce more protein. By  identifying cells with abnormally high protein concentrations, the  researchers could accurately differentiate between tumors and healthy  tissue – without waiting for stain to set in.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Each type of molecule has a unique vibrational state of energy in its  bonds. When the resonance of that vibration is enhanced, it can produce a  signal that can be used to identify cells with high concentrations of  that molecule. NIVI uses two beams of light to excite molecules in a  tissue sample.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">&#8220;The analogy is like pushing someone on a swing. If you push at the  right time point, the person on the swing will go higher and higher. If  you don&#8217;t push at the right point in the swing, the person stops,&#8221;  Boppart said. &#8220;If we use the right optical frequencies to excite these  vibrational states, we can enhance the resonance and the signal.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">One of NIVI&#8217;s two beams of light acts as a reference, so that combining  that beam with the signal produced by the excited sample cancels out  background noise and isolates the molecular signal. Statistical analysis  of the resulting spectrum produces a color-coded image at each point in  the tissue: blue for normal cells, red for cancer.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">Another advantage of the NIVI technique is more exact mapping of tumor  boundaries, a murky area for many pathologists. The margin of  uncertainty in visual diagnosis can be a wide area of tissue as  pathologists struggle to discern where a tumor ends and normal tissue  begins. The red-blue color coding shows an uncertain boundary zone of  about 100 microns – merely a cell or two.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">&#8220;Sometimes it&#8217;s very hard to tell visually whether a cell is normal or  abnormal,&#8221; Boppart said. &#8220;But molecularly, there are fairly clear  signatures.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">The researchers are working to improve and broaden the application of  their technique. By tuning the frequency of the laser beams, they could  test for other types of molecules. They are working to make it faster,  for real-time imaging, and exploring new laser sources to make NIVI more  compact or even portable. They also are developing new light delivery  systems, such as catheters, probes or needles that can test tissue  without removing samples.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">&#8220;As we get better spectral resolution and broader spectral range, we can  have more flexibility in identifying different molecules,&#8221; Boppart  said. &#8220;Once you get to that point, we think it will have many different  applications for cancer diagnostics, for optical biopsies and other  types of diagnostics.&#8221;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Source: <em>University of Illinois</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/new-imaging-technique-accurately-finds-cancer-cells-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BellBrook Labs Develops New High Content Assay to Explore Tumor Cell Invasion in 3D Matrix</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/bellbrook-labs-develops-new-high-content-assay-to-explore-tumor-cell-invasion-in-3d-matrix/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/bellbrook-labs-develops-new-high-content-assay-to-explore-tumor-cell-invasion-in-3d-matrix/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 06:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Circulating Tumor Cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metastases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=1019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BellBrook Labs has developed a high-content tumor cell invasion assay (http://www.bellbrooklabs.com/iuvo_services.html) by expanding the capability of its proprietary iuvo™ Microconduit Array platform to assess three dimensional cell movement through extracellular matrix. The results of this research, recently published in the Journal of Biomolecular Screening (Vol 15, 2010, p. 1114-1151 (http://jbx.sagepub.com/content/15/9/1144.full)), showcase the ability of BellBrook&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BellBrook Labs has developed a high-content tumor cell invasion assay (http://www.bellbrooklabs.com/iuvo_services.html) by expanding the capability of its proprietary iuvo™ Microconduit Array platform to assess three dimensional cell movement through extracellular matrix. The results of this research, recently published in the Journal of Biomolecular Screening (Vol 15, 2010, p. 1114-1151 (http://jbx.sagepub.com/content/15/9/1144.full)), showcase the ability of BellBrook&#8217;s 3D ECM Invasion Assay Service (http://www.bellbrooklabs.com/iuvo_services.html) to advance the exploration of new targets for anti-cancer drug development.</p>
<p>Madison, WI (PRWEB) November 11, 2010</p>
<p>BellBrook Labs announced the publication of studies on an enabling new approach for studying tumor cell invasion entitled “An Automated High-Content Assay for Tumor Cell Migration through 3-Dimensional Matrices,” in the October volume of Journal of Biomolecular Screening (JBS). In the paper, Dr. Steven Hayes, Victoria Echeverria and their colleagues at BellBrook describe how the company&#8217;s iuvo™ Microconduit Array platform was used to overcome the limitations of current methods to enable development of an information-rich, 3D tumor cell invasion assay using automated high content analysis.</p>
<p>Metastasis is the predominant cause of death from cancer, and tumor cell migration is a key element in the metastatic process. Understanding how tumor cells invade other tissues and developing new drugs that block the process are fundamental challenges in cancer research. However, modeling tumor cell invasion the way it occurs in the body – three dimensional movement of cells through ECM (Extracellular Matrix) &#8211; has proven difficult, especially in an automated, high throughput format, largely because culturing and imaging cells in ECM in traditional mulitwell plates is problematic. As described in the JBS paper, the BellBrook team was able to circumvent these difficulties by performing invasion assays in submicroliter channels in their recently developed iuvo Microchannel 5250 plates. Metastatic prostate cells were added to the liquid media compartment and allowed to migrate into the collagen-filled microchannels and automated microscopy was used to image the ultrathin assay compartments, generating quantitative data on the number of cells invading the matrix and distance traveled as well as effects on cell proliferation. The study showed that that cell movement through ECM in the microchannels was truly 3-dimensional, and therefore, representative of the in vivo invasion process. In addition, quantitative potency measurements were obtained for known inhibitors of cell migration, as well as information on the effect of the inhibitors on cell health, demonstrating the utility of the assay for anti-cancer drug discovery. By using this newly-developed assay in their 3D ECM Invasion Assay Service, BellBrook can provide researchers with valuable information on how effectively and specifically their potential drug molecules target the invasion process.</p>
<p>About BellBrook Labs. BellBrook Labs, LLC develops detection reagents and microfluidic devices that accelerate the discovery of more effective therapies for cancer and other debilitating diseases. Transcreener® is a patented high throughput screening assay platform that was introduced in 2005 and is used to identify inhibitors for kinases and other types of protein drug targets. The iuvo™ Microconduit Array technology is a line of unique microscale devices for miniaturization and automation of advanced cell models that are more representative of human physiology. Visit BellBrook&#8217;s website for more information: http://www.bellbrooklabs.com.</p>
<p>Contact us at 866.313.7881 or info(at)bellbrooklabs(dot)com for more information.</p>
<p>###</p>
<p>For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prweb2010/11/prweb4773854.htm</p>
<p>Read more: http://www.benzinga.com/press-releases/10/11/p602184/bellbrook-labs-develops-new-high-content-assay-to-explore-tumor-cell-in#ixzz1533AXeKW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/bellbrook-labs-develops-new-high-content-assay-to-explore-tumor-cell-invasion-in-3d-matrix/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High-Tech Lung Cancer Test Cuts Risk of Dying</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/high-tech-lung-cancer-test-cuts-risk-of-dying/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/high-tech-lung-cancer-test-cuts-risk-of-dying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW YORK, Nov. 4, 2010 Study Shows Older Smokers Who Puff a Pack a Day Less Likely to Die from Cancer if Screened with CT Scan By Jonathan LaPook, M.D. Video Lung Cancer Screening Breakthrough Lung cancer is the No. 1 cancer killer, taking the lives of an estimated 157,000 Americans per year. For the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>NEW YORK, Nov. 4, 2010</p>
<h2>Study Shows Older Smokers Who Puff a Pack a Day Less Likely to Die from Cancer if Screened with CT Scan</h2>
<div>By Jonathan LaPook, M.D.</div>
</div>
<div>Video Lung Cancer Screening Breakthrough</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7023518n"></a>Lung  cancer is the No. 1 cancer killer, taking the lives of an estimated  157,000 Americans per year. For the first time, a high-tech way of  screening has been shown to drastically cut the risk of dying from the  disease. Dr. Jon LaPook reports.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li> <img src="http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2010/11/04/image7023571g.jpg" border="0" alt="The effectiveness of CT scanning for lung cancer has been debated for years. A key concern: the test picks up lung abnormalities that are not cancer. These are common in heavy smokers and can result in costly, anxiety-producing tests." width="244" height="183" />The  effectiveness of CT scanning for lung cancer has been debated for  years. A key concern: the test picks up lung abnormalities that are not  cancer. These are common in heavy smokers and can result in costly,  anxiety-producing tests. <strong> (CBS)</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>(CBS) </strong> No cancer kills more  Americans than lung cancer. Estimates are more than 220,000 will be  diagnosed this year and 157,000 will die.</div>
<p>On Thursday, for the first time, a major government study showed a  high-tech way of screening for lung cancer can drastically reduce the  death toll, <strong>CBS Medical Correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook</strong> reports.</p>
<p>After 50 years of smoking, 67-year-old Steffani Torrighelli knew she  was at high risk for lung cancer. Two years ago she enrolled in a  study, and sure enough a CT scan picked up an early stage tumor before  she had any symptoms.</p>
<p>&#8220;I said, &#8216;God gave me a second chance in life,&#8217; and that&#8217;s how I looked at it,&#8221; Torrighelli said.</p>
<p>Now, for the first time, that screening test has been proven to save lives in heavy smokers like her.</p>
<p>The study looked at more than 53,000 men and women who smoked the  equivalent of a pack a day for about 30 years. These older smokers, ages  55 to 74, were screened with either chest X-ray or a more sensitive CT  scan that gives a three-dimensional view. After five years, those who  got the scans had 20 percent fewer deaths from lung cancer.</p>
<p>&#8220;The 20 percent reduced mortality indicates that this approach is able to save lives,&#8221; said Dr. Douglas Lowy of the <a href="http://www.cancer.gov/">National Cancer Institute</a>.</p>
<p>The effectiveness of CT scanning for lung cancer has been debated  for years. A key concern: the test picks up lung abnormalities that are  not cancer. These are common in heavy smokers and can result in costly,  anxiety-producing tests.</p>
<p>Another concern is radiation. A CT scan, even in low dose, delivers  about 15 times more radiation than a chest X-ray. But the new study  suggests the benefit of finding lung cancer early trumps the risks.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is one of the most important cancer findings in the last 10  years,&#8221; said Dr. Harvey Pass of the department of cardiothoracic surgery  at NYU Langone Medical Center. &#8220;It proves that you can save patients&#8217;  lives by detecting cancer early.&#8221;</p>
<p>Four years ago, Barton Lazarus had a CT scan that caught an early  lung cancer missed by a chest X-ray. Doctors removed the tumor, and  today he&#8217;s cancer free.</p>
<p>Since Torrighelli&#8217;s lung surgery two years ago, she&#8217;s also cancer free and vigilant about screening.</p>
<p>&#8220;I can walk,&#8221; said Torrighelli. &#8220;I can do everything that I did before. I&#8217;m feeling good. I feel perfect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Right now, 85 percent of patients diagnosed with lung cancer die  because it&#8217;s not caught soon enough. However, not all of the 80 million  smokers in the United States should get screened just yet, only high  risk ones.</p>
<p>There are some drawbacks. For every 300 people who are screened, one  life is saved, but 70 people were told they had an abnormality that  turned out to be totally benign.</p>
<p>Another consideration is cost. The CT test costs between $300 and  $400 and is not covered by Medicare or most plans. However, the  government will be looking closely at this trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/high-tech-lung-cancer-test-cuts-risk-of-dying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Luminous Jellyfish cells and early cancer diagnosis</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/luminous-jellyfish-cells-and-early-cancer-diagnosis/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/luminous-jellyfish-cells-and-early-cancer-diagnosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 04:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diagnostic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[11/04/2010 It sounds like an idea plucked from the realms of science fiction writing. But in this case, there is nothing fictional about it. Scientists in Yorkshire have developed a process that uses the luminous cells from jellyfish to diagnose cancers deep within the human body. Red fluorescent cells inside an experimental tumour. The method [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11/04/2010</p>
<p>It sounds like an  idea plucked from the realms of science fiction writing. But in this  case, there is nothing fictional about it. Scientists in Yorkshire have  developed a process that uses the luminous cells from jellyfish to  diagnose cancers deep within the human body.</p>
<div id="images">
<div><img src="http://www.european-hospital.com/media/article/7698/image.jpg" alt="article image" align="right" />Red fluorescent cells inside an experimental tumour.</div>
</div>
<p>The method has been developed at the Yorkshire Cancer Research  Laboratory at The University of York and the man who leads the York  team, Professor Norman Maitland, believes it will revolutionise the way  some cancers are diagnosed. “Cancers deep within the body are difficult  to spot at an early stage, and early diagnosis is critical for the  successful treatment of any form of cancer,” he said.</p>
<p>“What we have developed is a process which involves inserting  proteins derived from luminous jellyfish cells into human cancer cells.  Then, when we illuminate the tissue, a special camera detects these  proteins as they light up, indicating where the tumours are.” The  process is an extension of the work done by American chemist Dr Roger Y  Tsien who won a Nobel Prize in 2008 for taking luminous cells from a  common jellyfish called the crystal jelly and isolating the green  fluorescent protein (GFP). The GFP is the substance that allows  jellyfish to glow in the dark.</p>
<p>“When we heard about Dr Tsien’s work, we realised how that advance  might be useful in the diagnosis of cancer,” said Prof Maitland.  “X-Rays, for example, struggle to penetrate well deeply into tissues and  bone, so diagnosing dangerous microscopic bone cancer is difficult. Our  process should allow earlier diagnosis to take place.”</p>
<p>What the Yorkshire Cancer Research team has done is to use an altered  form of the protein so that it shows up as red or blue, rather than its  original green. Colour is important for these tests, as most colours in  the spectrum are rapidly absorbed, and tumours deep within the body  become invisible. You can try this for yourself by shining a torch light  through your hand &#8211; the only colour which you can see is red.</p>
<p>In the procedure, viruses containing the proteins are targeted to  home in on tiny bundles of cancer cells scattered throughout the body  (metastases). Normally this would not be enough to see the minute  tumours which are too small to be seen by conventional scanning  techniques, but the viruses then start to grow, and while doing so make  more of the red fluorescent proteins.</p>
<p>Thousands of copies are made in each cancer cell, a process, which is  repeated in the surrounding cells, as the virus infection spreads and  then stops. “When a specially developed camera is switched on, the  proteins just flare up and you can see where the cancer cells are.” said  Prof Maitland, “We call the process ‘Virimaging’ ”.</p>
<p>If the research continues to go according to plan, the method is  expected to be ready for clinical trials within five years and could be  ready for diagnostic use by clinicians a few years after this. It has to  be tested thoroughly, as a failure to detect such small cancers has  serious consequences for patients.</p>
<p>However, while the system works in the laboratory, one major hurdle  is a shortage of specialised cameras. Only one company, based in the  United States, has so far designed and built a camera system which  allows the jellyfish proteins to be seen with the desired resolution  deep in the body. The camera costs around half a million pounds and Prof  Maitland is currently raising the funds to be able to buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/11/luminous-jellyfish-cells-and-early-cancer-diagnosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should You Fear Radiation Exposure Associated with Medical Scans?</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/should-you-fear-radiation-exposure-associated-with-medical-scans/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/should-you-fear-radiation-exposure-associated-with-medical-scans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From HealthNewsDigest.com Aug 21, 2010 &#8211; 8:56:00 AM (HealthNewsDigest.com) &#8211; The short answer is…maybe. Critics of the health care industry postulate that our society’s quickness to test for disease may in fact be causing more of it, especially in the case of medical scans. To wit, the radiation dose from a typical CT scan (short [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From HealthNewsDigest.com</p>
<p>Aug 21, 2010 &#8211; 8:56:00 AM</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="2" cellpadding="0" width="97" align="left">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><img src="http://www.healthnewsdigest.com/artman/uploads/2/3_27.jpg" border="1" alt="" width="97" height="133" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>(HealthNewsDigest.com) &#8211; The short answer is…maybe. Critics of the  health care industry postulate that our society’s quickness to test for  disease may in fact be causing more of it, especially in the case of  medical scans. To wit, the radiation dose from a typical CT scan (short  for computed tomography and commonly known as a “cat scan”) is 600 times  more powerful than the average chest x-ray.</p>
<p>A 2007 study by Dr. Amy Berrington de González of the National Cancer  Institute projected that the 72 million CT scans conducted yearly in the  U.S. (not including scans conducted after a cancer diagnosis or  performed at the end of life) will likely cause some 29,000 cancers  resulting in 15,000 deaths two to three decades later. Scans of the  abdomen, pelvis, chest and head were deemed most likely to cause cancer,  and patients aged 35 to 54 were more likely to develop cancer as a  result of CT scans than other age group.</p>
<p>Another study found that, among Americans who received CT scans, upwards  of 20 percent had a false positive after one scan and 33 percent after  two, meaning that such patients were getting huge doses of radiation  without cause. And about seven percent of those patients underwent  unnecessary invasive medical procedures following their misleading  scans. CT scans are much more common today than in earlier decades,  exacerbating the potential damage from false positives and excessive  radiation exposure.</p>
<p>“Physicians and their patients cannot be complacent about the hazards of  radiation or we risk creating a public-health time bomb,” says Dr. Rita  Redberg, a cardiologist at University of California-San Francisco. “To  avoid unnecessarily increasing cancer incidence in future years, every  clinician must carefully assess the expected benefits of each CT scan  and fully inform his or her patients of the known risks of radiation.”</p>
<p>CT scans are not the only concern. Mammograms are now routine for women  over 40 years old. But some studies suggest that these types of  screenings may cause more cancers than they prevent. Because of this,  the federally funded U.S. Preventive Services Task Force now recommends  that women not otherwise considered high risk for breast cancer wait  until age 50 to begin getting mammograms—and then to get them every two  years instead of annually. However, the American Cancer Society argues  that such restraint would result in women dying unnecessarily from  delaying screenings.</p>
<p>Women with a family history of breast cancer may be at greatest risk.  Researchers from the University Medical Center Groningen in the  Netherlands found that five or more x-rays—or any exposure to  radiation—before the age of 20 for “high risk” women increased the  likelihood of developing breast cancer later by a factor of two and a  half.</p>
<p>Individuals should ask tough questions of their physicians to determine  if and how much screening is absolutely necessary to look for suspected  abnormalities. Our knowledge of the risks of radiation-based screenings  will only help us to make more informed decisions about our health.</p>
<p>CONTACTS: National Cancer Institute, www.cancer.gov; American Cancer  Society, www.cancer.org; University Medical Center Groningen,  www.umcg.nl.</p>
<p>SEND YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONS TO: EarthTalk®, c/o E – The  Environmental Magazine, P.O. Box 5098, Westport, CT 06881;  earthtalk@emagazine.com. E is a nonprofit publication. Subscribe:  www.emagazine.com/subscribe; Request a Free Trial Issue:  www.emagazine.com/trial.</p>
<p>Subscribe to our FREE Ezine and receive current Health News, be eligible  for discounted products/services and coupons related to your Health. We  publish 24/7.<br />
<a href="http://www.healthnewsdigest.com/"> HealthNewsDigest.com</a></p>
<p>For advertising/promotion, email: <a href="mailto:tvmike13@healthnewsdigest.com">tvmike13@healthnewsdigest.com</a> Or call toll free: 877- 634-9180</p>
<p>© Copyright</p>
<p><script src="http://www.healthnewsdigest.com/cgi-bin/grabyear.pl"></script>by HealthNewsDigest.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/should-you-fear-radiation-exposure-associated-with-medical-scans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Longest disease-free interval before recurrence of osteosarcoma</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/448/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/448/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Follow up Treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the best of our knowledge, this case report describes the longest disease-free interval between primary diagnosis and metastatic recurrence of an osteosarcoma.Case presentation. A 35-year-old Caucasian American man presented with asymptomatic lung metastases 21 years after being diagnosed and treated for lower extremity osteosarcoma. He underwent curative lung resection, but 2 years thereafter developed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the best of our knowledge, this case report describes the longest disease-free interval between primary diagnosis and metastatic recurrence of an osteosarcoma.Case presentation.</p>
<p>A 35-year-old Caucasian American man presented with asymptomatic lung metastases 21 years after being diagnosed and treated for lower extremity osteosarcoma. He underwent curative lung resection, but 2 years thereafter developed metastatic disease in the scapula and tibia and, after resection and chemotherapy, is in remission 1 year later.</p>
<p>Conclusion:</p>
<p>This case highlights the importance of long follow-up periods and continued surveillance of osteosarcoma patients after initial curative treatment.</p>
<p>Author: Ari HalldorssonSteven BrooksSam MontgomerySuzanne Graham<br />
Credits/Source: Journal of Medical Case Reports 2009, 3:9298</p>
<p><a href=" http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2803821/">Full Study</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/448/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>After Stroke Scans, Patients Face Serious Health Risks</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/after-stroke-scans-patients-face-serious-health-risks/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/after-stroke-scans-patients-face-serious-health-risks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Imaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[July 31, 2010By WALT BOGDANICH When Alain Reyes’s hair suddenly fell out in a freakish band circling his head, he was not the only one worried about his health. His co-workers at a shipping company avoided him, and his boss sent him home, fearing he had a contagious disease. Only later would Mr. Reyes learn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>July 31, 2010By <a title="More Articles by Walt Bogdanich" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/b/walt_bogdanich/index.html?inline=nyt-per">WALT BOGDANICH</a></div>
<div id="articleBody">
<p>When Alain Reyes’s hair suddenly fell out in a freakish band circling  his head, he was not the only one worried about his health. His  co-workers at a shipping company avoided him, and his boss sent him  home, fearing he had a contagious disease.</p>
<p>Only later would Mr. Reyes learn what had caused him so much physical  and emotional grief: he had received a radiation overdose during a test  for a <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about strokes." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/stroke/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">stroke</a> at a hospital in Glendale, Calif.</p>
<p>Other patients getting the procedure, called a CT brain perfusion scan,  were being overdosed, too — 37 of them just up the freeway at Providence  Saint Joseph Medical Center in Burbank, 269 more at the renowned  Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles and dozens more at a hospital  in Huntsville, Ala.</p>
<p>The overdoses, which began to emerge late last summer, set off an investigation by the <a title="More articles about the U.S. Food And Drug Administration." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/f/food_and_drug_administration/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Food and Drug Administration</a> into why patients tested with this complex yet lightly regulated  technology were bombarded with excessive radiation. After 10 months, the  agency has yet to provide a final report on what it found.</p>
<p>But an examination by The New York Times has found that radiation  overdoses were larger and more widespread than previously known, that  patients have reported symptoms considerably more serious than losing  their hair, and that experts say they may face long-term risks of <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Cancer." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/cancer/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">cancer</a> and brain damage.</p>
<p>The review also offers insight into the way many of the overdoses  occurred. While in some cases technicians did not know how to properly  administer the test, interviews with hospital officials and a review of  public records raise new questions about the role of manufacturers,  including how well they design their software and equipment and train  those who use them.</p>
<p>The Times found the biggest overdoses at Huntsville Hospital — up to 13  times the amount of radiation generally used in the test.</p>
<p>Officials there said they intentionally used high levels of radiation to  get clearer images, according to an inquiry by the company that  supplied the scanners, GE Healthcare.</p>
<p>Experts say that is unjustified and potentially dangerous.</p>
<p>“It is absolutely shocking and mind-boggling that this facility would  say the doses are acceptable,” said Dr. Rebecca Smith-Bindman, a  radiology professor who has testified before Congress about the need for  more controls over CT scans. Yet because the hospital said no mistakes  were made, regulatory agencies did not investigate.</p>
<p>The F.D.A. was unaware of the magnitude of those overdoses until The  Times brought them to the agency’s attention. Now, the agency is  considering extending its investigation, according to Dr. Alberto  Gutierrez, an F.D.A. official who oversees diagnostic devices.</p>
<p>Patients who received overdoses in Huntsville say that in addition to <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Hair loss." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/hair-loss/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">hair loss</a>, they experienced headaches, <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Amnesia." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/memory-loss/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">memory loss</a> and confusion. But at such high doses, experts say, patients are also at higher risk of brain damage and cancer.</p>
<p>A spokesman for Huntsville Hospital, which now acknowledges that some  patients received “elevated” radiation, said officials there would not  comment.</p>
<p><strong>Growing Number of Cases</strong></p>
<p>So far, the number of patients nationwide who got higher-than-expected radiation doses exceeds 400 at eight <a title="Recent and archival health news about hospitals." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/hospitals/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier">hospitals</a>,  six in California alone, according to figures supplied by hospitals,  regulators and lawyers representing overdosed patients. A health  official in California who played a leading role in uncovering the cases  predicts that many more will be found as states intensify their search.</p>
<p>“I cannot believe that this is not occurring in the rest of the  country,” said Kathleen Kaufman, head of radiation management for the  Los Angeles County Department of Public Health. “That’s why we are so  keen on the rest of the states to go look at this.”</p>
<p>The Food and Drug Administration acknowledges, too, that the number does not capture all the overdoses.</p>
<p>The cases come at a time when Americans are receiving more medical  radiation than ever before, a result of rapid technological advancements  that improve diagnosis but can also do harm when safeguards and  oversight fail to keep pace.</p>
<p>Even when done properly, CT brain perfusion scans deliver a large dose  of radiation — the equivalent of about 200 X-rays of the skull. But  there are no hard standards for how much radiation is too much. The  overdoses highlight how little some in the medical profession understand  about the operation of these scanning devices and the nature of  radiation injuries, as well as the loose requirements for reporting  accidents when they are detected.</p>
<p>For a year or more, doctors and hospitals failed to detect the overdoses  even though patients continued to report distinctive patterns of hair  loss that matched where they had been radiated. After the Food and Drug  Administration issued a nationwide alert asking hospitals to check their  radiation output on these tests, a few hospitals continued to overdose  patients for weeks and in some cases months afterward, according to  records and interviews.</p>
<p>Four of the hospitals involved were identified in recent months: the Los Angeles County and <a title="More articles about University of Southern California" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_southern_california/index.html?inline=nyt-org">University of Southern California</a> Medical Center, where one patient received seven and a half times the  amount generally used; Bakersfield Memorial Hospital, where 16 people  received up to five and a half times too much; South Lake Hospital in  central Florida, where an unknown number of patients received 40 percent  more than usual; and an unidentified hospital in San Francisco,  government officials said.</p>
<p>None of the overdoses can be attributed to malfunctions of the CT scanners, government officials say.</p>
<p>At Glendale Adventist Medical Center, where Mr. Reyes and nine others  were overdosed, employees told state investigators that they consulted  with GE last year when instituting a new procedure to get quicker images  of blood flow, state records show. But employees still made mistakes.</p>
<p>As a result, hospital officials said, a feature that technicians thought  would lower radiation levels actually raised them. Cedars-Sinai gave a  similar explanation.</p>
<p>“There was a lot of trust in the manufacturers and trust in the  technology that this type of equipment in this day and age would not  allow you to get more radiation than was absolutely necessary,” said  Robert Marchuck, the Glendale hospital’s vice president of ancillary  services.</p>
<p>A GE spokesman, Arvind Gopalratnam, said the way scanners were  programmed was “determined by the user and not the manufacturer.” GE, he  added, has no record of Glendale seeking its help setting up the new  procedure in 2009.</p>
<p>Most of the known overdoses, including the biggest, occurred on scanners  made by GE Healthcare. At two hospitals that use Toshiba scanners — Los  Angeles County-U.S.C. and South Lake in Florida — officials said the  manufacturer suggested machine settings that ultimately produced too  much radiation. Representatives of Toshiba agreed to be interviewed in  their California office but abruptly canceled.</p>
<p>A dozen overdose victims in California and Alabama said in interviews  that the long delay in uncovering the flawed tests had left them  struggling to understand what was happening to their health. One patient  suspected that the Rogaine he used to stop hair loss was actually  causing it. Another patient received <a title="Recent and archival health news about steroids." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/health/diseasesconditionsandhealthtopics/steroids/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier">steroid</a> injections to stop the hair loss.</p>
<p>Patients said doctors speculated that their temporary hair loss might  stem from a variety of causes — stress or a ponytail tied too tight —  and that redness and <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Rashes." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/rashes/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">rashes</a> were caused by detergent used to wash bed sheets.</p>
<p>“What is amazing and seems painfully obvious is if someone walks in with  a band of hair missing around the entire circumference of their head,  you would ask the question: Have you had a <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about CT scan." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/test/ct-scan/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">CT scan</a>?”  said Richard A. Patterson, a Los Angeles lawyer who represents some of  the patients. “Not ‘What did you eat for breakfast yesterday that would  cause your hair to fall out today?’ ”</p>
<p>The overdoses did not discriminate. Among the victims: a member of  Cedars-Sinai’s own board of governors, Ruthe Feldman. Mrs. Feldman says  she left the board after learning about the mistake.</p>
<p>The Food and Drug Administration, in trying to assess the scope and  cause of the overdoses, has had to rely on state radiation control  officials for information. But if Alabama is any indication, the agency  is not getting a full picture.</p>
<p>A Huntsville Hospital spokesman, Burr Ingram, said that about 65  possible stroke patients there had been overradiated. Lawyers  representing patients say the number of overdoses is closer to 100.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, Alabama officials say the number is actually zero since the  state does not define an acceptable dosing level. “No such thing as an  overdose,” said James L. McNees, director of the Alabama Office of  Radiation Control.</p>
<p><strong>A Hospital’s Low Moment</strong></p>
<p>One day last August, the radiation safety officer at Cedars-Sinai, Donna Early, decided she had to act.</p>
<p>It was a low moment for such an esteemed institution. Patients were  being overradiated during CT brain perfusion scans, hospital officials  concluded, and it was Ms. Early’s job to tell county health officials.</p>
<p>The genesis of Ms. Early’s alert was an event on the morning of July 4,  when a 52-year-old executive producer of films, H. Michael Heuser,  arrived in the emergency department with stroke symptoms.</p>
<p>A “code brain” was immediately called, signaling a life-or-death  situation. A blood clot in the brain can be dissolved with medicine, but  doctors must do it within several hours, before brain cells die from a  lack of oxygen. So Mr. Heuser was rushed into a room with several CT  scanners, where he underwent one brain perfusion study and at least one  more later. A CT perfusion scan, which lasts about 45 seconds, can  identify a stroke through a series of blood flow images.</p>
<p>Mr. Heuser did have a stroke, from which he would recover. But other parts of his body inexplicably began to break down.</p>
<p>“I had a full body rash — my whole body, legs, armpits, bottom, my back — with these red <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Angioedema." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/angioedema/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">welts</a>,” Mr. Heuser said.</p>
<p>It burned and itched. Then clumps of hair began to fall out. “I went  completely bald in a perfectly symmetrical 4-inch-wide band that  extended from ear to ear all the way around my head,” he recalled. The  hospital, he said, responded by offering him a hairpiece.</p>
<p>Finally, a doctor was so struck by the unusual nature of Mr. Heuser’s  hair loss that he took a picture. A second patient reported similar hair  loss. Eventually, the hospital made the connection, and on Aug. 28, Ms.  Early called county health officials, records show. From then on, as  the accounting of overdoses at Cedars-Sinai reached 269 over a period of  18 months, Mr. Heuser would be known in government reports simply as  “Patient 1.”</p>
<p>To this day, no one at Cedars-Sinai knows who programmed the scanners  that delivered the overdoses, officials there say. But in written  statements to The Times, hospital officials said they had figured out  how they might have occurred.</p>
<p>Normally, the more radiation a CT scan uses, the better the image. But  amid concerns that patients are getting more radiation than necessary,  the medical community has embraced the idea of using only enough to  obtain an image sufficient for diagnosis.</p>
<p>To do that, GE offers a feature on its CT scanner that can automatically  adjust the dose according to a patient’s size and body part. It is, a  GE manual says, “a technical innovation that significantly reduces  radiation dose.”</p>
<p>At Cedars-Sinai and Glendale Adventist, technicians used the automatic  feature — rather than a fixed, predetermined radiation level — for their  brain perfusion scans.</p>
<p>But a surprise awaited them: when used with certain machine settings  that govern image clarity, the automatic feature did not reduce the dose  — it raised it.</p>
<p>As a result, patients at Cedars-Sinai received up to eight times as much  radiation as necessary, while the 10 overradiated at Glendale received  four times as much, state records show.</p>
<p>GE says the hospitals should have known how to safely use the automatic  feature. Besides, GE said, the feature had “limited utility” for a  perfusion scan because the test targets one specific area of the brain,  rather than body parts of varying thickness. In addition, experts say  high-clarity images are not needed to track blood flow in the brain.</p>
<p>GE further faulted hospital technologists for failing to notice dosing levels on their treatment screens.</p>
<p>But representatives of both hospitals said GE trainers never fully explained the automatic feature.</p>
<p>In a statement, Cedars-Sinai said that during multiple training visits,  GE never mentioned the “counterintuitive” nature of a feature that  promises to lower radiation but ends up raising it. The hospital also  said user manuals never pointed out that the automatic feature was of  limited value for perfusion scans.</p>
<p>A better-designed CT scanner, safety experts say, might have prevented  the overdoses by alerting operators, or simply shutting down, when doses  reached dangerous levels.</p>
<p>To Mr. Heuser, it is unconscionable that equipment able to deliver such high radiation doses lacks stronger safety features.</p>
<p>“When you are in a car and it backs up, it goes beep, beep, beep,” he  said. “If you fill the washing machine up too much, it won’t work. There  is no red light that says you are overradiating.”</p>
<p>Manufacturers say they will address some of these issues in newer models.</p>
<p><strong>Form Letter, No Apology</strong></p>
<p>Huntsville Hospital informed patients that they had been overdosed in a  two-page form letter that included no apology. The word radiation was  mentioned once — in the ninth sentence.</p>
<p>“We have identified a few patients, including you, who received a scan  in which the dosage level was elevated,” stated the letter, dated Dec.  11, 2009.</p>
<p>The acknowledgment by hospital officials that 65 people were overradiated has come slowly.</p>
<p>After the California overdoses became public, Huntsville officials  reviewed their testing and determined that their use of higher doses to  get clearer images was not a mistake and was, in fact, appropriate,  according to the GE inspection report. Therefore, they concluded, they  had no overdoses.</p>
<p>State and federal officials said they did not investigate Huntsville,  because there were no equipment malfunctions or because the dosing  decisions were considered part of the practice of medicine. As a result,  the only public accounting of the number of overdoses in Huntsville has  come from the hospital, not government inspectors.</p>
<p>By contrast, California officials conducted investigations, released  inspection reports and have cited at least four hospitals for failing to  safely irradiate patients.</p>
<p>Because Huntsville Hospital officials declined to be interviewed, it is  unclear how they determined who had been overradiated, when the  overdoses started or why patients with sudden hair loss did not arouse  more suspicion.</p>
<p>Melissa Faye Adams is one of a number of patients who have yet to be  told they were overdosed, even though they have pictures of themselves  with the distinctive band of hair loss. More than two years ago, just  shy of her 40th birthday, she underwent a stroke test at Huntsville  Hospital after developing a <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Headache." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/headache/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">headache</a>.  Fifteen days later, her hair began falling out and her life began to  lurch about in disquieting ways. She still keeps a plastic bag full of  her hair marked with that date, 6/15/08. “I panicked,” she said.</p>
<p>It would take another year and a half of worry, of unsatisfying doctor  visits, before her hairdresser called one day last December telling her  to pick up a copy of the local paper. In the paper, the hairdresser  said, was “a picture of a lady who looks just like you.” The woman said  she had been overradiated at Huntsville Hospital.</p>
<p>Dr. Lon Raby, a Huntsville dermatologist, also noticed the picture. “I  recognized the pattern with it,” Dr. Raby said. “I’ve seen six or eight  all in the same time frame.”</p>
<p>Suzanne Sloan, a popular fifth-grade teacher, was one of his patients.  She saw the picture, too. “We were screaming,” Ms. Sloan said. “She had  the same identical thing.”</p>
<p>Ms. Sloan’s fruitless search for an explanation had taken her to the  University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital, Ochsner Health System in  Louisiana and <a title="More articles about Vanderbilt University" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/v/vanderbilt_university/index.html?inline=nyt-org">Vanderbilt University</a> in Tennessee. “They had no clue,” she said. “I lost 15 pounds. I couldn’t sleep.”</p>
<p>Ms. Sloan had tried to cover her missing hair using bobby pins. But one  day at school, a gust of wind blew and children saw her strip of missing  hair. One got sick and vomited, she said. As word of her condition  spread, former students flocked to her classroom, some crying. “We heard  you were dying,” one said. “Is there something we can do?”</p>
<p>Another patient, an aerospace engineer who says she had a <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Generalized tonic-clonic seizure." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/generalized-tonic-clonic-seizure/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">seizure</a> after her scan, said her dermatologist wrote to Huntsville Hospital out  of concern for her and another patient with similar symptoms.</p>
<p>“Even after the dermatologist put two and two together and asked  Huntsville Hospital to contact me, they never did,” said the engineer,  who provided a picture of her hair loss but asked that her name be  withheld because of professional reasons.</p>
<p>She said she suffered from memory loss and confusion.</p>
<p>Huntsville Hospital officials said they did not routinely record  radiation dose levels before 2009. Mr. Ingram, the spokesman, said the  hospital did keep information needed to calculate the dose, but he  declined to say whether officials had gone back to determine doses for  all patients who had brain perfusion scans.</p>
<p>The form letter Huntsville sent to overdose patients appears to play  down the damage that high doses can inflict. The hospital told patients  that hair loss and skin redness might occur but would go away. “At this  time, we have no recommendations for you to have any follow-up  treatment,” the letter said.</p>
<p>Health experts elsewhere have warned of possible eye damage, in addition to the higher risk of cancer and brain damage.</p>
<p>For Dr. Smith-Bindman, a professor at the <a title="More articles about the University of California." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/organizations/u/university_of_california/index.html?inline=nyt-org">University of California, San Francisco</a>,  the larger question raised by her review of overdose cases, including  one in Huntsville, is whether their symptoms actually required such a  powerful test in the first place. She also noted that many of the  patients were relatively young.</p>
<p>“These tests have really high doses,” she said. “And there’s no system  for figuring out who is getting them and why they are getting them.”</p>
<p>Reducing mistakes is important, but the bigger challenge, she said, is to eliminate unnecessary testing.</p>
<p>“Utilization has increased dramatically, and as a society we have not had the time to respond.”</p>
<div>
<p>Kristina Rebelo contributed reporting.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/08/after-stroke-scans-patients-face-serious-health-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

