Comments for Defeat Osteosarcoma http://defeatosteosarcoma.org This site is dedicated to curing osteosarcoma Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:34:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Enhanced tumor regression and tissue repair when zoledronic acid is combined with ifosfamide in rat osteosarcoma by James Street http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/09/enhanced-tumor-regression-and-tissue-repair-when-zoledronic-acid-is-combined-with-ifosfamide-in-rat-osteosarcoma/#comment-241 James Street Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:34:19 +0000 http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=765#comment-241 This study has been neglected too long. Human trials should begin immediately. This study has been neglected too long.

Human trials should begin immediately.

]]> Comment on Mistletoe and solid tumors by jlb http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/07/mistletoe-and-solid-tumors/#comment-210 jlb Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:08:19 +0000 http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=350#comment-210 Regarding the US oncologists treatment of cancer, one must understand that the universities are funded by the drug companies therefore when there is no money to be made, there will be no studies done. The doctors are doing what they are taught to do. No money is made when cancer is cured. Regarding the US oncologists treatment of cancer, one must understand that the universities are funded by the drug companies therefore when there is no money to be made, there will be no studies done. The doctors are doing what they are taught to do.
No money is made when cancer is cured.

]]> Comment on The Absurdities of Water Fluoridation by admin http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/03/the-absurdities-of-water-fluoridation/#comment-44 admin Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:54:54 +0000 http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=160#comment-44 The sad thing about the fluoride problem is not simply what it represents in itself, but what it represents as a symptom of the dysfunctional nature of the American government and of American corporations. Many books have been written about the corrupt practices of American corporations, from Big Pharma and Agribusiness to to Weapons industry and the Business of War, and just as many about government stupidity and collusion with big business. The fluoride problem is only a ripple on the surface of this ocean of greed and stupidity. The sad thing about the fluoride problem is not simply what it represents in itself, but what it represents as a symptom of the dysfunctional nature of the American government and of American corporations. Many books have been written about the corrupt practices of American corporations, from Big Pharma and Agribusiness to to Weapons industry and the Business of War, and just as many about government stupidity and collusion with big business. The fluoride problem is only a ripple on the surface of this ocean of greed and stupidity.

]]> Comment on The Absurdities of Water Fluoridation by Philip http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/03/the-absurdities-of-water-fluoridation/#comment-27 Philip Tue, 16 Mar 2010 08:39:34 +0000 http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=160#comment-27 The National Academy of Sciences did a thorough review on fluoride in 2006. They documented numerous deleterious effects of fluoride on many organ systems including increased potential risk for bone fractures (the well characterized disease of skeletal fluorosis) possibly increased risk of osteosarcoma (hence the site), reduced IQ, thyroid dysfunction, endocrine dysfunction and others all 300 pages is online if anyone cares to confirm it. Of course don't forget dental fluorosis -have to laugh. The conservative, political NAS ended with recommending that the EPA should more strictly regulate fluoride. Their findings mirror those in the peer-reviewed medical literature, while Harvard trained toxicologist also extensively documented behavioral changes in mice upon exposure to blood levels of fluoride not far greater than those experienced through water fluoridation and other sources of exposure. Former, well credentialed EPA scientists have been fired for bucking the political line on this issue. Meanwhile 90% of the fluoride placed into our water supply is not industrial grade sodium fluoride, it is silicofluorides, quite simply, scraped from the sides of Florida phosphate plant smokestacks. If it weren't thrown into the water supply it would have to be disposed of as hazardous waste. You can read more on this starting here http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/2009/11/water-fluoridation-part-i.html if you suspect I am just making this all up. The National Academy of Sciences did a thorough review on fluoride in 2006. They documented numerous deleterious effects of fluoride on many organ systems including increased potential risk for bone fractures (the well characterized disease of skeletal fluorosis) possibly increased risk of osteosarcoma (hence the site), reduced IQ, thyroid dysfunction, endocrine dysfunction and others all 300 pages is online if anyone cares to confirm it. Of course don’t forget dental fluorosis -have to laugh. The conservative, political NAS ended with recommending that the EPA should more strictly regulate fluoride. Their findings mirror those in the peer-reviewed medical literature, while Harvard trained toxicologist also extensively documented behavioral changes in mice upon exposure to blood levels of fluoride not far greater than those experienced through water fluoridation and other sources of exposure. Former, well credentialed EPA scientists have been fired for bucking the political line on this issue. Meanwhile 90% of the fluoride placed into our water supply is not industrial grade sodium fluoride, it is silicofluorides, quite simply, scraped from the sides of Florida phosphate plant smokestacks. If it weren’t thrown into the water supply it would have to be disposed of as hazardous waste. You can read more on this starting here http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/2009/11/water-fluoridation-part-i.html if you suspect I am just making this all up.

]]>