<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Defeat Osteosarcoma &#187; cancer research underfunded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/tag/cancer-research-underfunded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org</link>
	<description>This site is dedicated to curing osteosarcoma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:16:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer Research by U.S. Disorganized, Underfunded, Study Says</title>
		<link>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/04/cancer-research-by-u-s-disorganized-underfunded-study-says/</link>
		<comments>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/04/cancer-research-by-u-s-disorganized-underfunded-study-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Street</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Finance and Politics of cancer research and treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Cancer Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer research underfunded]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April 15, 2010, 11:45 AM EDT By Shannon Pettypiece April 15 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The U.S. government’s cancer research network is “approaching a state of crisis” as waste and inefficiency cause 40 percent of late-stage trials it funds to be abandoned before completion, a report found. The government-funded National Cancer Institute’s clinical trials group isn’t able [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="story-body">April 15, 2010, 11:45 AM EDT</p>
<p>By Shannon Pettypiece</p>
<p>April 15 (Bloomberg) &#8212; The U.S. government’s  cancer research network is “approaching a state of crisis” as waste and  inefficiency cause 40 percent of late-stage trials it funds to be  abandoned before completion, a report found.</p>
<p>The government-funded National Cancer Institute’s  clinical trials group isn’t able to effectively study the benefits of  new and current treatments, according to the analysis by the Institute  of Medicine. Among the report’s recommendations is increasing funding  for cancer studies, simplifying the process of designing trials, and  offering incentives for doctors to do such research.</p>
<p>The NCI’s network of cancer centers and doctors  tests cancer treatments on 25,000 patients a year, with an annual budget  of about $145 million, the report said. Cancer kills about 560,000  people in the U.S. each year, the second-biggest cause of death behind  heart disease, according to the Centers for Disease Control and  Prevention in Atlanta.</p>
<p>“If the clinical trial system does not improve  its efficiency and effectiveness, the introduction of new treatments for  cancer will be delayed and patient lives will be lost unnecessarily,”  the report said.</p>
<p>The trial network, called the Clinical Trials  Cooperative Group Program, is comprised of doctors at universities and  community cancer centers who develop clinical trials and enroll patients  in those studies. Its work fills a research gap by focusing on efforts  not typically undertaken by drug companies, such as comparing rival  treatments or testing combinations of experimental therapies.</p>
<p>The process for carrying out those trials has  become too complex and can take more than two years to design and  initiate clinical trials, the report said.</p>
<p>‘Important Contribution’</p>
<p>“The cooperative groups have made a very  important contribution that individual drug companies might not have  made,” said John Mendelsohn, president of the University of Texas M.D.  Anderson Cancer Center and chair of the committee that did the report.  “We would lose something very important if the cooperative groups  faded.”</p>
<p>The Institute recommended the NCI consolidate  administrative operations, streamline government oversight of clinical  trials, develop more efficient trial design, and create incentives for  investigators to participate in studies. Health insurers should also pay  for the cost of non-experimental care that is part of the clinical  trial, such as additional scans, lab tests and physician visits.</p>
<p>The report was conducted at the request of the  NCI director John Niederhuber. The Institute of Medicine is part of the  National Academy of Science, a non-profit organization that acts as an  adviser to the federal government.</p>
<p>&#8211;Editors: Lisa Rapaport, Reg Gale</p>
<p>To contact the reporter responsible for this story: Shannon  Pettypiece at spettypiece@bloomberg.net.</p>
<p>To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reg Gale at  rgale5@bloomberg.net.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://defeatosteosarcoma.org/2010/04/cancer-research-by-u-s-disorganized-underfunded-study-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

